1. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION VIOLATES PRINCIPLES OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS BY HAVING GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE BASED UPON A PRO SE PLEADING IT, SUA SPONTE, FOUND AND A CLEARLY ERRONEOUS PRESENTATION OF MATERIAL FACTS BY THE LOWER COURT?

2. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN FINDING THAT A PRO SE PRISONER ABANDONED AN ISSUE THAT WAS SUBJECT TO DE NOVO REVIEW, WHERE THE PROSE PRISONER ADOPTED, INCORPORATED AND REALLEGED INTO HIS INITIAL BRIEF THE ARGUMENTS BELOW BECAUSE THE PRISON LAW LIBRARY LOST HIS ARGUMENT DURING THE WORD PROCESSING OF THE BRIEF AND MOVING FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME WAS NOT AN OPTION?

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions