After a state has violated Lewis v. Casey by actively denying access to legal research facilities to a pro se prisoner on an initial post-conviction appeal, should the state then be allowed to place state procedural bars on the inmate for failure to present a claim on this initial appeal? Can the state place this procedural bar without first analyzing the Lewis vs. Casey denial?

Whether a state can place procedural bars on a pro se prisoner's initial post-conviction appeal after denying the prisoner access to legal research facilities in violation of Lewis v. Casey