No. 23-537
Faisal Ashraf, aka Sal v. United States
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeal-waiver circuit-split computer-fraud-and-abuse-act criminal-procedure due-process factual-basis federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure plea-agreement
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the federal courts of appeals can refuse to consider a challenge to the sufficiency of the factual basis for a guilty plea when the plea agreement includes an appeal waiver.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal courts of appeals can refuse to consider a challenge to the sufficiency of the factual basis for a guilty plea when the plea agreement includes an appeal waiver
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-02-06
Reply of petitioner Faisal Ashraf filed. (Distributed)
2024-01-19
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-12-20
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2023-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2024.
2023-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2023 to January 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2023)
2023-09-21
Application (23A259) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 1, 2023.
2023-09-19
Application (23A259) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 4, 2023 to December 1, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Cato Institute
Clark M. Neily III — Cato Institute, Amicus
Faisal Ashraf
Erin Glenn Busby — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent