No. 23-534
Peter Otoh v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-court-procedure diversity-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction navarro-rule real-party-in-interest removal removal-jurisdiction securitized-trust traditional-trust trustee trustee-citizenship
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether the Eleventh Circuit was required to apply Navarro's rule to the Respondent, before concluding that the Respondent is the real party to the controversy for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. (2) Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred for concluding that the Respondent's Trust is a traditional trust without citing support in the record
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit was required to apply Navarro's rule to the Respondent
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Bank National Association to respond filed.
2023-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Peter Otoh
Peter Otoh — Petitioner
U.S. Bank National Association
Stephen C. Parsley — Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Respondent