Latonia Smith v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada
Whether AOL A(C2I0B) targets conduct lone of SPeecin.and.Conduck Can sir distinciand.Confircking opinyvons among tthe lowes Coutts ond signifreanty taising Fiest Amendoaenconcens, Werne/ AAG) KC2)(8)_15 400 vag ue_oMowivg cases like Petitioner's free speecntn ays instouce Condcases Ike UiSiv Seynraw si to lee swiegi up in criminal proceedings and bypassing tne fics lime o€ dekewse= tine istackcoucs
TIL. Whether AAGLALZ)CB) is. being, unconstitwhana\ly applied to Reditioner targeting protected fe sttacn ad solange Ee tend,
TV. Whetner Perisioner is being detained tm Wioladion of tne Fest Amendment of tne Wited Stakes Conshitutron
AL. Wnetiner the distact judge odonoleligation release Petitioner after concluding thas the Conxents of tne emails weve Not_criminal since Sending anemailis DNoracime
Whether tne. 221 Petition focalWetof raven Corpus trump competency in _lega\ Proceedings meaning tatdespite being Meld fox _compexency Pelitvonetcam-Cnallenge The constijuironalisy of Inec dekewtioa keeping with Article 1,94 of tne US: Constitution Haat ensures the tight of The Writ of Hoaleas Corps sma motbe Sustendedexceoh when inthe case of ebe\ion or invasion public. safety may equice ite
Whether AOL A(C2I0B) targers_conduct lone_0f SPeecin.and.Conduck Can sir — —_ opinyvons among _. — tthe lowes Coutts ond signifreanty | -taising Fiest Werne/ AAG) KC2)(8)_15 400 vag ue_oMowivg ——___. cases like Petitioner's free speecntn ays | instouce Condcases Ike UiSiv Seynraw si | to lee swiegi up in criminal proceedings and __ —_ bypassing tne fics lime o€ dekewse=tine __ istackcoucs