No. 23-5317
Aaron J. Bressi v. Jeffery Brennen, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion case-dismissal civil-procedure court-procedure due-process failure-to-state-a-claim failure-to-state-claim judicial-discretion legal-review procedural-dismissal public-interest standing
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. How does this Complaint get dismissed by Both the Honorable District Court and the Honorable Appeals Court, for failure to State a Claim?
2. How is this Case not Considered that both the Honorable District Court s and the Honorable App^ did abused their discretion throughout this entire Case.Is Court eaA
3. How Can this Very Serious issue not be Considered to be importance to the publi o-f the issue*e
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How does this Complaint get dismissed by Both the Honorable District Court and the Honorable Appeals Court, for Failure to State a Claim
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-31
Waiver of right of respondent Jeffery Brennen, et al. to respond filed.
2023-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Aaron J. Bressi
Aaron J. Bressi — Petitioner
Jeffery Brennen, et al.
Kimberly A. Boyer-Cohen — Marshall Dennehey, P.C. , Respondent