No. 23-5315

Jesse Dean Redfearn v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2023-08-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights compulsory-process confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process sixth-amendment witness-obstruction
Latest Conference: 2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the trial court and/or the prosecution violate the Sixth (6th) Amendment, [confrontation clause], and clearly established law of the United States Supreme Court, by concealing the location of the only material witness and preventing her from testifying in trial?

Did the State violate the United States Constitution by exposing the jury to incomplete preliminary hearing transcripts in the trial?

Did the Assistant District Attorney violate Mr. Redfearn's Civil Rights, [42 U.S.C.A., Ch. 21. § 1983], by obstructing his defense and preventing the only witness(es) who could identify him, from testifying in a criminal trial?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court and/or the prosecution violate the Sixth Amendment confrontation-clause and clearly-established-law by concealing the location of the only material witness and preventing her from testifying

Docket Entries

2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)

Attorneys

Jesse Dean Redfearn
Jesse Dean Redfearn — Petitioner