No. 23-5303
Jeanne Germeil v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: controlled-substances controlled-substances-act criminal-procedure expert-testimony good-faith jury-instructions medical-practice ruan-v-united-states
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the United States Supreme Court's Decision in Ruan v. United States Warrants Certiorari Review of the Court's Refusal to Instruct the Jury on "Good Faith"?
II. Whether Certiorari Review is Warranted as a Result of Improper Government Expert Testimony and by Allowing the Government Expert to Testify Concerning All of Dr. Jeanne Germeil's Patients Based Upon a Random Sample of Ten Patient Files?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Supreme Court's Decision in Ruan v. United States Warrants Certiorari Review of the Court's Refusal to Instruct the Jury on 'Good Faith'?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeanne Germeil
Richard L. Rosenbaum — Law Offices of Richard Rosenbaum, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent