1. Concerning Exculpatory Evidence- Should Mr. Ramos ' convictions be set aside under Brady, withheld
exculpatory evidence which led to the due process violation under the 14th Amendment and the illegal
actions of the prosecution?

2. Concerning Jury Misconduct Should Mr. Ramos ' convictions be set aside under Title 22 O.S. § 952
Grounds for a New Trial if in an Evidentiary Hearing there are reliable witnesses and Sworn Affidavits to
confirm the juror 's misconduct and the 5th and 14th Amendments?

3. Concerning Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Should Mr. Ramos ' conviction be set aside due to the
violation of the 6th Amendment due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prejudice for the excessive
sentence.

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the First Amendment's free speech protections