No. 23-5295
Custodio Carrasco-Garcia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: counsel-performance criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance right-to-appeal sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
In light of the facts of this case, was the defense counsel ineffective in light of this court's precedent in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), in not automatically filing a notice of appeal, where there was impediment to the right to file an appeal.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the defense counsel ineffective in not automatically filing a notice of appeal?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2023)
Attorneys
Custodio Carrasco Garcia
Custodio Carrasco-Garcia — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent