No. 23-5288
Jay Hymas v. Department of the Interior, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege case-disposition civil-procedure constitutional-law federal-appellate-rules judicial-review ninth-circuit ninth-circuit-court-of-appeals procedural-standards
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion, United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 1982, overcomes the Federal Appellate Rules regarding the disposition of a case, and if so whether the principles of that very opinion can be violated in dismissing a case by asserting that claims of violation of the attorney-client privilege are "insubstantial".
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion overcomes the Federal Appellate Rules regarding the disposition of a case, and if so whether the principles of that opinion can be violated in dismissing a case by asserting that claims of violation of the attorney-client privilege are 'insubstantial'
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent Interior Department, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Interior Department, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Jay Hymas
Jay Hymas — Petitioner