No. 23-5285
Asmerom Gebreselassie v. Gigi Matteson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability conflict-of-interest court-of-appeals docket-entry ninth-circuit procedural-history retained-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment unreasonable-determination-of-fact
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Err In Failing To Grant
A Certificate Of Appealability When It Denied Petitioner 's Motion
For Certificate Of Appealability Based On A Wrong Docket
ENTRY No. 15, Which Was Not Petitioner's Motion For Certificate
Of Appealability?
2. Did The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Err In Failing To Grant
A Certificate Of Appealability On Petitioner's Claim Of The Violation
Of His Sixth Amendment Right To The Retained Counsel Of Choice That
Was Unreasonably Rejected By The California Court Of Appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in failing to grant a certificate of appealability?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Gigi Matteson, Warden to respond filed.
2023-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Asmerom Gebreselassie
Asmerom Gebreselassie — Petitioner
Scott Frauenheim, Warden
Jill M. Thayer — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent