I. D&U.BLS. IT£/SPAf\-DY 1 f*g4i4i an.i4r U/£LS faiLiud *rUfl4 du.il4u v of WaLiCd. flluftlCr
fcdiLnil Dfde ^ t\\n.ct^£ of i/udicfmeAi + 'i'lLoHXX ^fiu.1I4y 1' of felOAiu mardtr
tdiXnif +106^ Charge O-f 'iAjdid4mCAi4 'Y'lfeH'l#* 2/wly OhJ£ ifudiui da.a.1 itiUfllued
■H)e Same euid«.Aicf. uJas used +6 prove £a.cb charge, of iMdit.+m>a>u4.
a^AmE/LlDX/tlfc (bi+triAifif XnJDXC.TWE aJT> Pe4»4id w£r ab\ei.4ed fa -Hie i/udi c4/yicaj4^pe+i+ia/uer abjet4«d 4ba4- 4be feioxtcj mu.rder did njoi go lalfb jmdi —
cim€Aj4» The. £<sur4 $4a4cd\ # fm 4d CKaM^e. i+- 4d r£a.d\.did
"H\£ d£a4b of jCrarfle mtrri soaj 54=Johiu^ bim Lu'r4b a. ku 'rfe*
Ba DEF£CT£D f\)ott 4 IrUOX^TrnEAJT -, 1V\£ lAidfd.4mC.M4* f4rue. L»il l^fdLi Is 46
iwd.lu.dt: $4a4£j CrimiAJal £ode 54a.4u.4fir vfai l s 4d i/adludt £d.tb £$S£/d~^
4/a.l €LerA-CAj4 of of4enJ$es dWar^ed* Special preseAi4m<2./u4 £aif&reA txf~~
fur iwdic4meAi4 Wa.i ame.Aide.d bvj 4ria.l C.cuf4»e4t.I

II. Lt\Sl AsSlGftimx/UT ulOLATId/U Jad^e irakai Qager uuas cL$ff^w£<4
4o 4ry pt4i4i a Alar's daS£\jaHiu a^oger c.aAi<du.c.ted uar Aire 4a setec4 4rial
jurij* ELeue*j bou.rs /L44trujards v fried Ue^axi iw 4he doiurfroom of Judge
tuilliaro Da.wi4l.All jii.dg

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by successive prosecutions for the same conduct, defective indictments, improper case assignment, insufficient evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and unlawful confinement