DID THE WYOMING SUPREME COURT APPLY AND FOLLOW FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE CORRECTLY?

II. IS THE WYOMING SUPREME COURTS DECISION ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS, OR OTHERWISE NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW?

WAS MR. HILYARD DENIED HIS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ON APPEAL ... NO STATE SHALL MAKE OR ENFORCE ANY LAW WHICH SHALL . . . DENY TO ANY PERSON WITHIN IS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS?

IV. WAS APPELLANT COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE IN NOT RAISING THE QUESTION OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL, AND PRESENTING THE WEAKEST ISSUE OF EVIDENCE CHALLENGES BECAUSE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

Did the Wyoming Supreme Court apply and follow Federal Rules of Evidence correctly?