I.
WAS EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT A TRIAL FOR MURDER SUBJECT TO THE
EXCLUSIONARY RULE, WHERE SAID EVIDENCE WAS THE RESULT OF AN
ILLEGAL SEARCH OF THE DEFENDANT'S CELL PHONE RESULTING IN "FRUITS
OF THE POISONOUS TREE''?

II.
SHOULD CELL-SITE LOCATION INFORMATION (CSLI) BEEN EXCLUDED AT
TRIAL UNDER CARPENTER V. UNITED STATES , 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018),
WHERE DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM A THIRD-PARTY CARRIER WITHOUT A
WARRANT?

Was evidence presented at a trial for murder subject to the exclusionary rule, where said evidence was the result of an illegal search of the defendant's cell phone resulting in 'fruits of the poisonous tree'?