Whether the Unless Se.ocW and Se^re ft VioUhon of my ^ ^ ^Q-P h&brU&C'/ /c///9 <?f?| (4/nendtn€o-f-S fi^htS >

uihAUr r'3^s" uihAUr r'3^s" rnyvoku °P ^ y , .pftfc&tfCwSe ne^er U«S jut : • anier Ae i + o /teaoVv)UfheAer my rl^MS 4Ae C/.5. ConSh'hitio* , £jere rtotfe proSe^ei aP myPre(,*,n*ary aJ! Marck 20, nn Ar hdi tt fir^hie case ro U 'M Co^AcJaj cr,»t, but rtfecSSd Prom COSpody(JoS nevtc 3&L . SuPP'o (enP evUwctHJ QcP U/he Her Phs t miPPmwhy and a Cons,'cP,on.(aJgS re an . d U esUo n g1 PreSen bed Gon-b/nae* -I/- » Whether Pbe alleged cur / 1991 !/l&ja\ Widened) in [/lolab^on o-P my nth P/mendiY) e/1 f r/jKK Under Pke u.S, ConSd/bud/om,bpGn Sdabemtnd ob February JZtr [/Jhedher Phe allied turfdden sdademend oP ilf IQ^li became McsdnniSSiHc Cl//dsnCB i/eged Ofn I Po havtf /y?oid& (\dpchraa fy 6nCe Hit SubShtfiCt) COnPeSS/on Phad JP SuPPoSe (j-P QffesH ? UJnS SuPPreSS^d * Urode Q SdaPemend Saying made oral Concession ad bhe. Scene o-P arresSs ZCp eJaS Pa hr /coded.) on c\ Che Scene jl never an snn , under fAe and /Xk n-mU~ ujere i/tolled sd OuJntrCUfhePher my -frterid-S tQ Ue u,S. ConSttbjPon P Pke Scent cla i fV\uJhen Seme one a X oJaS Sh'll arresbed. of the Q.lle$ ei drajSj bad i / tt .tr . SPrlaf) Phe con Cession aP Some qC Pbe q\Ie3e^one.uc/hed'he elSt doifrnSc) aunerSh!? esCMlshed reasonable doolbhr o\ )

Whether my af resb oda£ reial\a i!oh bar me tj a cll/'ll Cornf!Dif/tf (xo^uinch 4-Ue oif Opiicer, H)ue Po The fi-acb ThaT b

Whether the warrantless search and seizure of February 14, 1991 violated the 4th and 14th Amendment rights