Did the Ninth Circuit's rejecting Petitioner's due process claim
regarding his change-of-plea hearing conflict with Boykin and its progeny,
particularly considering that the district court record in its totality evidenced that
Petitioner had serious cognitive deficiencies associated with his having Autism
Spectrum Disorder, about which the district court did not inquire?

Did the Ninth Circuit's rejecting Petitioner's due-process claim regarding his change-of-plea hearing conflict with Boykin-and-its-progeny, particularly considering that the district-court-record in its totality evidenced that Petitioner had serious-cognitive-deficiencies associated with his having Autism-Spectrum-Disorder, about which the district-court did not inquire?