No. 23-5222
Mustafa Ali v. Jeffrey Minehart, Judge, et al.
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion constitutional-provisions due-process habeas-corpus pcra-petition post-conviction-relief sentencing-discretion state-court-procedure statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the PCRA Court abused its discretion in failing to convert Petitioner's State Habeas Petition into a PCRA Petition?
2. Whether the Trial Court imposed a sentence greater than the statutory maximum?
3. Whether Pennsylvania Contitutional Statutes 18 Pa.C.S.§l 102 and 42 Pa.C.S.§ 9711 are void for vagueness?
4. Whether the. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas has abolished the Writ of Habeas Corpus?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the PCRA Court abused its discretion in failing to convert Petitioner's State Habeas Petition into a PCRA Petition?
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Mustafa Ali
Mustafa Ali — Petitioner