Was na-F -tee, ChtcC aJ US ltf,H US ?a CK/ljc.R-k,vtc Gr,W*j^ Kr,/^' F,

0 H Doei nof Ike. /d/vU reqtfint AUeA dot 4o Hoe fLetyoniew+Y na>vre£ pcn.se to JwYwvkay cmd -fkilovt Ao present belov-e Ike ClX/v4 a ^eniAne iS£\jt d material 4d pe-W+iower <-£ -IkertW 1?/ -mlilkd -It) ic/haiiiAry j i4yv*u*il Z✓vt (n .«Ji/c/0ft f *4 £.-T ft)*-''" *Tcs -£« i I j*^y Umcsumi dut hsairS Vi&UL iMj

VZ.\ fib£d KioV 'Ike. law require AhcA dot It) 4-ke ReSpondwi'S /wi-neipoM^ Its m&Auua +0 Voted* sentence dot la XiSwtent*. betVujf void £ unccnsiihAtdrtal ihe peAtontr Jenlence by laW r/ioil i»>. t/actffed ivk/rt JkM K ^A/iderttre, do Sup^i -ted sentence is Vot'd and imposed u/(+kcuf Dot ProceXT of Law?

Cb& F2of -Ike. law ctqyirt du£, 4o Uve, flefpchd&tl I fV2*n VZ)id 3odgjview+ 4 ml l7LIL AfpUcahevy ?cterioMC iC \btrttert -enltt/iJ by taw to 1we r<?hl£tf\££ vacated and released £fdw\ unl&Mjtel ccdintmeMA v\Mirt Sentence imposed »/Viaf imposed lA/ilUad m&tcfmeir^ .Signed waiver of indidymnl ^ lads of Doe, Process?nan ^res pan ft to CYlOtwn tor Relief

Does the law require that due to the Respondent's non-response to Summary Judgment and failure to present before the Court a genuine issue of material fact, the petitioner is therefore entitled to Summary Judgment?