The Petitioner Aisha Wright conducted an overall review of my case record and Concluded newly substantial evidence that was not supported by the Administrative Law of preponderance evidence . In the case of Cannon v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc No. 15-20127 (frth Cir. 1/13/2016). In this Case; After Finding new factual documents of evidence of violation of dereliction of Judicial Judge misconduct with the intend of illegal malpractice of lawyers/ ineffectiveness of counsels knowingly and willfully disregarded and failed to impose the Applicable laws of violations of 28 U.S.C. 453-Oath of justices and judges, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Rule 16, Rule 2.9, U.S.C 455, Rule 60, 59(e), 56,11, 42 USC 2000e, 2 USC code 1311, and cal. R. Ct. Canon 1 and 3 of statutory causes of action of factual elements of legal remedy for a reconsideration of this case for a relief for a summary judgment put aside be void, whereas; the lower court abuses its judicial discretion of notwithstanding the Federal Rules by law in contrast, connotes the instrumental use of law as a tool for self-interest to have the petitioner Aisha Wright case to be maliciously and prejudicial dismissed.to

Note; Whereas the Petitioner raise question did all four parties received some type of financial gain from this case to be dismissed in favor of Respondent?

1. Since the Lower District Court perjure oneself-interest of "No transcript and No Hearing" , See Appendix. G. H, which would have an effect on this newly findings, which lead the petitioner believing of no such documents, until March 2023 and April 2023, if this would had been presented to the Appeal of the Fifth District in the beginning from the Lower District Court, would this have been sufficient enough to survive proper consideration of the Petitioner Retaliation claim?

2. By the new factual documents see Appendix K, Docket: "No transcript and No Hearing ", does this constitute a violation form the Lower District court violate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of Rule 2.9, Rule 60, Rule 59(e) and Cannon 1,3 permits to bring action to recover losses, fraud, newly discovered evidence with misrepresentation by the Lower District Court Judge and illegal malpractice or ineffectiveness of counsels by erroneous Barred of hearings?

3. Did the Lower District Court violated The Federal Rules of Civil Procedures with Statutory provisions of Rule 2.2 impartial and fairness, Rule 2.3, Rule 2.6, Rule 2.11, Rule 8.4 and U.S.C 455 and cannon 1, 3 provides in a Civil action may be brought by the Plaintiff to obtain other appropriate equitable relief to redress violations of the statute of the Petitioner Retaliation Case?

4. Whether the Lower District Court failed to give the correct action of the plaintiff of being deprive as a human person had the opportunity to be properly be heard, instead a "P Wright " as The Client ", see Appendix I&J is a violation of Substantive Due process rights of subversive under the Fourteenth Amendment and Articles with the intentional violation of fraud to deceive the Court in favor of the Respondent to bring test in question of a decision of

Whether the lower court abused its discretion in dismissing the petitioner's case despite newly discovered evidence of judicial misconduct, violations of federal laws and rules, and potential financial gain by the parties involved