No. 23-521
Denise Fisher v. Jodi M. Moore, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights clearly-established constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment qualified-immunity state-action state-created-danger
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court should hold that it was clearly established by November 2019 that the Due Process Clause prohibits state officials from knowingly placing a specific person at an unjustifiably high risk of serious harm, or should at least clearly establish that doing so violates due process going forward.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause prohibits state officials from knowingly placing a person at unjustifiably high risk of harm
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Jodi Moore, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2023)
2023-09-20
Application (23A255) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 13, 2023.
2023-09-18
Application (23A255) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 12, 2023 to December 11, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Denise Fisher
Andrew Timothy Tutt — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Petitioner
Jodi Moore, et al.
Jonathan Griffin Brush — Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P., Respondent
Clay Thomas Grover — Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P., Respondent