I. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it
denied appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea
where 1) there was an insufficient factual basis for
the plea, 2) counsel was ineffective for failing to
properly advise appellant concerning whether there was a
factual basis for the plea and certain enhancements,
3) the Superseding Information was defective because it
referenced an amended version of the statute and 4)
appellant was suffering from an illness that affected
his judgment?

II. Whether the Circuit Court abused its discretion when it
denied the Pro Se Motion for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc
for the prior opinion not reviewing the denial of an
evidentiary hearing and issues that fall within the scope
of U.S. vs Cramer?

Whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying appellant's motion to withdraw guilty plea