THIS PETITION PRESENTS NOVEL QUESTIONS OF LAW, THE RESOLUTION OF WHICH WILL DEVELOP THE LAW AND HAVE NATIONWIDE IMPACT, WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEEDED AND DESIRABLE POLICY THAT WILL ASSIST THE COURT AND LOWER COURTS IN IDENTIFYING AND RECTIFYING WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS.

DID CARPENTER HAVE :

A FAIR TRIAL, THE RIGHT TO CONFRONT WITNESS ON PRIOR ACTS WHEN THERE'S ONLY A HE SAY SHE SAY TRIAL ON CREDIBILITY OF BOTH THE COMPLAINANT AND THE DEFENDANT?

THE RIGHT TO IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF COMPLAINANTS MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS?

THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?

THE RIGHT TO A DEFENSE?

THE RIGHT WHETHER A COURT OF APPEALS, WHEN EXAMINING THE ISSUE OF WHETHER THE REAL CONTROVERSY WAS TRIED IN A CRIMINAL CASE?

THE RIGHT SHOULD LOWER COURTS BE REQUIRED TO CONSIDER LEGAL ERRORS MADE IN PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, BEFORE RELYING ON PRIOR PROCEEDINGS TO DEEM THE ISSUE FORECLOSED?

Did Carpenter have a fair trial, the right to confront witness on prior acts when there's only a he say she say trial on credibility of both the complainant and the defendant?