1) Is it constitutional for the Colorado Supreme Court,
in the exercise of its exclusive jurisdiction, to defy
Federal Supreme Court precedent and the Federal
Constitution? As a general matter, but specifically
in regard to Petitioner Soondar 's Federal due
process rights?

2) Given the enormous request for audiences this
Federal Supreme Court receives each year, and
therefore the statistically improbable opportunity to
review various state attorney admission matters of
exclusive jurisdiction, are the Colorado Supreme
Court Rules 206 and 207.9 constitutional? Rules
that may or may not allow for review, may or may
not follow Federal and State Jurisprudence; may or
may not follow the Court 's self-created rules and
subject matter precedence; may or may not reconcile
decisions with a written opinion?

Is the Colorado Supreme Court's attorney admission rules constitutional?