Mr. Whitaker alleges the County of Dealware, Pennsylvania, District Attorney's Office violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause to the United States Constitution, when the county assumed prosecutorial authority that was never ordained by the people of Pennsylvania from its inception. Thereby, Mr. Whitaker was convicted in large part of a process and procedures that derived from a unconstitutional foundation laws. The omitted information also derives from the certified or public records. In finding no miscarriage of justice or statutory requirements in the presentment of a Priraa Facie Showing, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals significantly erred in denying Mr. Whitaker's authorization to file a second habeas corpus.

Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals erred in declining to grant Mr. Whitaker authorization to file a second habeas corpus petition when his incarceration stems from a violation of nis constitutional rights, specifically when the District Attorney's Office of Delaware County deprived him of his liberty without due process of law, pursuant to laws that's un-ratified and void from its inception, which create! a miscarriage of justice exception in this matter with exceptional circumstances?

Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals erred in declining to grant Mr. Whitaker authorization to file a second habeas corpus petition when his incarceration stems from a violation of his constitutional rights, specifically when the District Attorney's Office of Delaware County deprived him of his liberty without due process of law, pursuant to Laws that's un-ratified and void from its inception, which created a miscarriage of justice exception in this matter with exceptional circumstances?