No. 23-5138
Martin Ramos-Urias v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure claim-processing immigration-removal in-absentia-removal judicial-review notice-to-appear separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation time-and-place
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
If the government serves an initial notice document that does not include the "time and place" of proceedings, followed by an additional document containing that information, has the government "initiat[ed]" removal proceedings under 8 U.S.C. § 1229, such that an immigration court has statutory license to enter a removal order?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government must comply with 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G) by providing a single notice document containing all required information, including the time and place of proceedings, or whether the government may rely on § 1229(a)(2) to provide subsequent notice of the new time and place
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Martin Ramos-Urias
Lisa Ma — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent