Whether the District Court erred in denying petitioner Braddock's right to expert and precipient witness testimony, and whether prosecutorial misconduct, constructive denial of effective assistance of counsel, and seven structural errors designated by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals warrant the issuance of a Writ of Prohibition to remedy the situation and put forth Braddock's three trial counsels' ineffective advocacy at the Supreme Court of the United States.

Whether dual role jury instruction should have been subject matter jurisdiction.

Whether a dual-role jury instruction is required when law enforcement officers testify as both expert and percipient witnesses