1) Can an original guilty plea be completely knowing and voluntary, when
the government, and the district court wrongly advised defendant about counsel,
§ 287 being a lawful predicate for an aggravated identity theft under § 1028A? And
must the entire plea be vacated?

2) Is Plenary Resentencing necessary when the District Court based its § 3C1.1
obstruction enhancement on defendant's refusal to plead guilty to aggravated
identity theft § 1028A when the court had no jurisdiction to receive such plea?

3) Is Plenary Resentencing now mandatory considering the Supreme Court's recent
decision in United States v. Dubin, No. 22-10?

4) Did the district court sentence Onamuti in excess of the statutory maximum?

Can an original guilty plea be completely knowing and voluntary?