WHETHER A STATE COURT SUBMITS A SUCCESSION OF VERDICTS BOTH GUILTY AND NOT GUILTY OF THE SAME COUNT, AGAINST THE SAME DEFENDANT, AND TO THE SAME TRIAL AND THE TRIAL COURT UNLAWFULLY SELECTS THE GUILTY VERDICT AS THE JURY'S TRUE VERDICT WITHOUT CONSULTING THE DEFENSE ABOUT AN ACTION THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN.

SHOULD PRINCIPLES OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROTECT A DEFENDANT FROM SUCCESSIVE PROSECUTIONS OF DOE v. POWELL'S ANALYSIS ON INCONSISTENT VERDICTS COME?

WHETHER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT WAS EXPANDED DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROTECTIONS UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO THE MOST SEVERE INSTANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL CONDUCT THAT GOADS A DEFENDANT INTO MOVING FOR A MISTRIAL. DOES THE APPREHENSION OF AN ACQUITTAL BY A TRIAL JUDGE AMOUNT TO THE LEVEL OF MISCONDUCT NEED IN VIGGES WHERE MERELY PROTECTION?

Whether principles of double jeopardy protect a defendant from successive prosecutions of inconsistent verdicts contrary to Powell's analysis