Would a jurist of reason find the District Court Clerk made a procedural error by failing to issue and mail the November 15th, 2021 termination order and the report and recommendation as required USCA§ 45, Clerk's Duties (c)?

Would a jurist of reason find the same procedural error denied the Petitioners Fourteenth Amendment due process right to file objection to the report and recommendation?

Would a jurist of reason find the same procedural error simultaneously denied the Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process right to raise the underlying constitutional violations in a fundamentally fair criminal proceeding?

Would a jurist of reason, who reviewed the attached police reports, think Police blatantly admitted to a warrantless intrusion of privacy to illegally obtain probable cause?

Would a jurist of reason who reviewed the attached police report, think Police blatantly admitted conspiring to use the a valid search warrant?

Would a jurist of reason think the the warrants, making them invalid as all fruit of the poisonous tree?

Would a jurist of reason who reviewed the attached police reports surmise that Police Officers used deception, artifice, tricks and misrepresentation to gain entry, because there no such thing as a possible wanted person?

Would a jurist of reason find the attached letter, from the York County Clerk Of Court's Office, denies the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment due process right to a fundamentally fair criminal proceeding?

Would a jurist of reason who reviewed the attached arrest warrants wonder why the Solicitor violated Brady by replacing arrest warrants?

Would a jurist of reason find it interesting to know the attached arrest warrants were unlawfully signed by a Rock Hill City Bond Bailiff who had no firsthand knowledge of the content of the affidavits he signed?

Did the Fourth Circuit Clerk's procedural error in assigning District Court case number; 1:21-cv-03714-TLW two different Fourth Circuit Docket numbers, damage the judicial process, denying my Fourteenth Amendment due process right to a fundamentally fair criminal proceeding?

Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus petition on procedural grounds without reaching the merits of the petitioner's constitutional claims