Whether The Violation of Standard of Review for Summary Judgment (Rule 60(d)(3); 18 U.S. Code § 1341; 18 U.S. Code § 1519 be allowed to stand uncorrected or violator go unpunished?

Whether and when a defendant's contemporaneous subjective understanding or beliefs about the lawfulness of its conduct are relevant to whether it "knowingly" violated 42 U.S. Code § 1983.

Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) (15 USC 45) and First Amendment, which allows Petitioner to Petition The Government ('Courts) For Redress Of Grievances and to prohibits "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce under Color Of Law."

Whether There Is A Double Standard In The Law, One For Respondent ("Corporate Banks") and Another For Pro Se Petitioner Pursuant to Summary Judgment, FRCP 56(c)?

Whether a judgment void on its face, when a Respondent Tampered with (or Altered Or Fabricated) Documentary Evidence in support of its Motion For Summary Judgment, and the

Whether the violation of standard of review for summary judgment be allowed to stand uncorrected or violator go unpunished