Vitaly Burleovitsch Kolosha v. Oklahoma
U/frthT /S> P/XOpB/2 uJtTBM SPATE- cl*0<u*LFs
AlBPtS£/~Af<5 TO tr&A-R- CLASS njtfSOJE A McecJpf Ceoc/MTY
Or/L/HJd \Tcy/2^/ ppPc/spp TO /Mb7cT~ p&ri tT\O a/S/L A A//)
OPE Y&/HL. LRTBfE £>YY77Uc.P A-TPO/LA/^Y p PjoS <ULr TSJ)
pnM A-s/YtUAY f £>M TAS. Y/hMfS. ^i///)£//^ PO/Z SAMS. Acpl
beBY JAS (OfcCfrhhOMA $TA7B- p&S TW/LY sDYctTOM
pjLOSB.ee/71B Aa/YuJAY ?
2, 1$, T7TB. SC/PP jZ&ZSY oM /SY 77/ tS SpATR p/UsS/ECUP p'O/Y OP
Exctrup atopy evf&£-*sc£ j pauo /la&ls To am AccxesBb A
i/t OL/Tpod OF T7f£- buB P/lOcMYS AMI) L/tS,CA t.
COM Mr? 70 7i od Am Ba/O MB//T W ?
(/MFOO-MArfaP*/ A/hOceP M?ic/S/lRtsegi OF C?rLAM&> Tc///y AM 6 j7~S>
l2BFa£.PL to fMO/cT TAB ACC^Xg/) OJAS pjDDB/Y 8>Y TAB.
STATE. P/LFSpcu./rj&P p/2M>M frPB&rtbA/XT AMI
T/VfAL TU/L y) .
3. UJfSpa OPS ACT )s & sloths aL bo COM /pro t/AMY loom PS
?M OMS T/LTAL / S>/FMS BV/b&'/TcjB t &AMS i/TctPm clAM
Oklahoma <.tac .cc sb.ptsm .csbs , so t~pat ttogbtpsp Tr
MAPtMUfY pup / £ fPMBMP T)PPB Pm (ASF) A y tt/b. S PRT'U 'TS P <otT
pFfVpCULA/L C.f2JME SO / 7" CP?PS>T7'TUTSS J>PATTY SY /*CAA2CB#A~
if Oil ?
Lf' UJyppp A PtStlpOM rs bBpA/MBb /Af A STATE PfLPgOAf
uJ ITH-OUT A yAL>J
Whether the Oklahoma state courts had jurisdiction to prosecute the petitioner after the federal court refused to hear the case and dismissed the charges a year later