1. This Claim is of exceptional importance, and is a vehicle to remedy the issues and conflict in our Judicial Systems by of Pretrial Motion 12(b)(6) which are recurring and warrants review. This is of significant importance to the administration of Justice as Pretrial Motions thwart remedy for meritorious and civil cascases that are deemed by the Courts non frivo lous. There is a divide amongst Judges and Legal Scholars use thereof to include contemporaneous Affirmed and Per Cu riam Affirmed Judgements.use onl

2. Will our Honorable Courts, remedy the longstanding conflict and issues within the Judicial, Legal Field of questionable and conflict ing Pre-trial motions? In light of past measures, attempts, and re views of the inefficiencies of Civil Litigation, the high and rising costs, undue delays and abusive practices associated and caused thereby? In that countless attempts to address the central issues, by amendment of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (the Federal Rules or Rule), by congressional statute, and by judicial doctrine have failed i.e. Cardoza Law Review?

Whether the recurring issues and conflicts in the judicial system regarding the use of pre-trial motions under Rule 12(b)(6) to thwart remedies for meritorious civil cases warrant review