(1) DID The DisTricT AND APPELLATE CouRTs VIOLATE APPELLANT'S 1ST, 5TH, 6TH, 8TH, AND 10TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS?

(2) DID The DisTricT AND APPELLATE CouRTs "DENY JUSTICE", PER THE "ULTIMATE JUDGMENT" TO RE-VISIT THE ISSUES THAT RESULTED IN THE VACATED JUDGMENT ON DECEMBER 20, 2020? THE SUPREME COURT, A YEAR AFTER THE COURT AFFIRMED 14 MONTHS LATER, FILED FOR "SUMMARY JUDGMENT" ON APPELLANT'S 2255 MOTION AND APPELLANT'S ORDER WAS VACATED?

(3) DID APPELLANT'S 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO "ACCESS TO THE COURTS" VIOLATED?

(4) WERE APPELLANT'S 5TH AND 14TH RIGHTS TO "DUE PROCESS" VIOLATED?

(5) WERE APPELLANT'S 6TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PROTECTION FROM "IMMINENT DANGER" BY USE OF CODED THINGS IN ASSAULTS, THREATS, ASSAULTS, AND ATTEMPTS TO MURDER IN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS VIOLATED?

(6) WERE APPELLANT'S 10TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO PROTECTION VIOLATED? COURTS DENIED 6TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS UNDER THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE TO CONFRONT WITNESSES AND OBTAIN EVIDENCE.

Whether the District Court and Appellate Court violated Appellant's 1st, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendment rights