Jerry A. Smith v. John Galipeau, et al.
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
As why 11 Possible to vidlale my Use Sights wher every one kacwit would harm me ia every bspectol lke?
wh D d Wwe Lille eS get Ay Key alebiny Skele] Seder haw and Wey [Prec witha. sushon q
Newly DEA Damen Leictay fed Tadge tell Blank Lies 'a Ht onder ia wilich ne hisousced way cose,
Sitohy Deck UScloo fail te Pespoad. to om T00/ Peel uocez te bela Shoe Ve sagushicc welahen of oy Rights?
why when Z wes assaulted Dy oft Paerish/itdier T wos Act ye any, veel hel frase Stell 4
Why Did Robert Ceclyr clery ony turk Olrinn wher L hod ll euidunt te Show) tt the hue?
We idly lous Ltecordel Lhitsally by Lt Ceeditlen on we 1 90a
Foes dil Captin here baow. thet Z tera G Phone Neb? in _Aac, if the, (1) wes Not tuppets Resoltiog to tre Kidaap pouclaa & ree tel toricgn' (11, St Anthony's. Hospibe!
totaly old Tivwelsh § ae Slade chery ane a fickek Rives aye thea wha tiaslly got
It Dened wt copies tec Coutts. froceedugs ordu bg USC Wo?
tous on ae S-2677' 324-22 Ver M dice pteconds [Pelthy condoct Recon Li Si) Ak
Signal ss_fespanded be boy Severel ofa rs if sk Shales Silent signa,
Cac Rabeas ACs ibosbs chia! Arde vesonSu1-1 (a) Oo ¥6t/ak>redacreas 5. ampae/inagicoBigioIe)
id Loy was werdins all of them me obfied of May VSC L rughh ts Aes lag Viola tect aad tathias wos boas rd Aothins was done abot this salty? Secucity ac _tahvmeac trealoeat?
Housis it aller PC luauers been eabered ia the OFS wss TL Shi able tp be pup
Abs Ladhy ws a Conduct Repott issvathor trefh ck ing fon TA ie He person Wiss ant on my visit itey List 2
Te Why ws5.Z.deaed oo DS%-10%> for A Repoltyr kateian Ptoss te tell my Styl be 19 Aduvenle locked.
bly was ZF Dasied by TA Burkitt wher Te Sad I witled to Ac hud Chet ging wy bile?
B41 FL too. Model is rehbilutdron) Mbilatcria why hid Gpbrnherr? tot SU Bleck tlhwe thet Laer.
Svppartto be lo
Possible violation of civil rights