No. 23-444
Steven Lee Moss v. Gary Miniard, Warden
Tags: 6th-amendment counsel-denial cronic-exception effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance prejudice sixth-amendment state-action strickland-standard strickland-v-washington united-states-v-cronic
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under Cronic.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under Cronic
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-30
Reply of petitioner Steven Moss filed. (Distributed)
2024-01-16
Brief of respondent Gary Miniard, Warden in opposition filed.
2023-11-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 16, 2024. See Rule 30.1.
2023-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2023 to January 15, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-14
Response Requested. (Due December 14, 2023)
2023-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent Gary Miniard, Warden to respond filed.
2023-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2023)
2023-07-07
Application (23A6) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 27, 2023.
2023-06-30
Application (23A6) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 30, 2023 to October 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Gary Miniard, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Steven Moss