1. When there is admitted by courts conflict be
tween the federal courts and state courts on such all-
important matters such as jurisdiction per Petitioner 's
22A445, which court is mandated to take preemptive
action to enforce this Court 's ruling in Yellow Freight
System, Incorporated v. Donnelly (1990) and ROBB v.
CONNOLLY (1884) to close the loophole of conflicting
oppositional jurisdiction, the federal court or the state
court?
Congress deprived state courts of the power they
normally have - that is, the power to decide their own
jurisdiction. E.g. , American Fire & Cas. Co. v. Finn, 341
U.S. 6 (1951); Landry v. Cornell Constr. Co., 87 R.I. 4,
137 A.2d 412 (1957). Federal decisions usually speak of
a duty of the court to raise the jurisdictional issue. E.g. ,
Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583, 588 (1939); St.
Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283,
287, n.10 (1938).

2. When there is proven First Breach, do the Fed
eral Courts have to proactively consider as the number
one priority over all others the First Breach because
uncured First Breach makes Supersedeas and all other
matters moot per PAUL E. MALONE, SR. & FAITH
LANIER MALONE, Plaintiffs v. FEDERAL HOME
LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A., Defendants, Case No. l:14-cv-193
(WLS) United States District Court, M.D. Georgia,
Albany Division. May 12. 2016 . Is a supersedeas
unconstitutional when there is proven "cannot enforce
contract until cure first breach "?

3. Nowhere in law is a lone judge able to act
without appeal or accountability but in Georgia state
courts there is ruling that there is no appeal or review
for supersedeas bonds that has become de facto means
for evictions during appeal process? Is it unconstitu
tional for there NOT to be an appeal/review mecha
nism within the Georgia Court system to review a sole
judge 's order concerning supersedeas? Instant case a
nullity no state jurisdiction order for an illegally in
flated supersedeas bond that violates O.C.G.A. § 5-6-
46(a) on a home that has almost 100% equity
($500,000) to debt to cover all potential costs of appeal
is being misused as means to evict 100% legally right
homeowner due to no appeal process.
e) Nothing in this Code section shall deprive the
superior courts of their separate power to grant super
sedeas under paragraph (1) of Code Section 15-6-9 (e)
Nothing in this Code section shall deprive the superior
courts of their separate power to grant supersedeas
under paragraph (1) of Code Section 15-6-9

4. Considering recent unanimous ruling TYLER
u. HENNE

When there is admitted by courts conflict between the federal courts and state courts on such all-important matters such as jurisdiction, which court is mandated to take preemptive action to enforce this Court's ruling?