No. 23-418
Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law agency-action consumer-group consumer-prices consumer-protection federal-agency-action injury-in-fact price-impact standing
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can the "injury in fact" element of standing, as to a consumer group challenging a federal agency action, be established by an evidentiary showing that the policies mandated by that agency action have resulted in large increases in consumer prices in the places where they have been implemented?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the 'injury in fact' element of standing be established by an evidentiary showing of increased consumer prices?
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
Waiver of right of respondents American Lung Association, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent Environmental Protection Agency to respond filed.
2023-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2023)
Attorneys
American Lung Association, et al.
Sean Hoe Donahue — Donahue & Goldberg, LLP, Respondent
Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council, et al.
Francis J. Menton Jr. — Law Office of Francis Menton, Petitioner
Environmental Protection Agency
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent