Whether claims for conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and § 1983 are sufficiently stated under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 8(2), so as to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, where the complaint alleges a detailed sequence of events from which a conspiracy may reasonably be inferred, including reference to public records which enhance the complaint's factual allegations, where there are no obvious alternative explanations to the conspiracy or the constitutional violations resulting therefrom, and where direct evidence of the agreement to conspire may only be developed from adverse witnesses through discovery.

Whether claims for conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(8) and § 1983 are sufficiently stated under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 8(2)