No. 23-345
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-employee federal-employee-rights mandamus regulatory-compliance statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I am a partially recovered federal employee classified under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301(d); yet, I remain unre- -
stored. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
averring there is no federal case law to determine:
Whether the National Park Service municipality's
properly constituted legislative body's conduct violated
5 C.ER. § 353.301(d), or constitutional rights of which
a reasonable person would have known?
Whether a private remedy is implicit in 5 C.FR.
§ 353.301(d) not expressly providing one?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the National Park Service municipality's conduct violated 5 C.F.R. § 353.301(d) or constitutional rights
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-28
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due November 1, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeffry Thul
Jeffry Thul — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent