1. Whether ALJs violate the rule of law by depriving
petitioners of their disability pensions on credibility
grounds when petitioners have met their burden of
proof and the questioning of their credibility is based
on an ALJ 's unexplained "impression " and on a state
expert 's opinion not based on medical facts.

2. Whether state Appellate and Supreme Courts re
spectively deny petitioners due process of the law
when:
a. Affirming an ALJ 's Decision by making false
statements or failing to address petitioner 's Brief 's legal
points showing that the ALJ 's Decision wasn 't
based on cogent reasons.
b. Ignoring a petitioner 's request to investigate
a likely collusion between the Appellate Court
and the agency in an ongoing appeal and later
denying review of said court 's decision.

3. Whether state courts violate the First Amendment
when sealing records on the grounds that petitioner 's
privacy needs to be protected even though such privacy
does not overcome the strong presumption of public ac
cess to records and even though petitioner wants the
record unsealed in order to share it with the public.

Whether ALJs violate the rule-of-law by depriving petitioners of their disability-pensions on credibility-grounds