SHOULD THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION,
lst-7th-14th AMENDMENTS, U.S. FAIR HOUSING
ACT, U.S. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, FEDERAL TRADE
COMMISSION ACT, UNITED STATES SHERMAN
AND CLAYTON ANTITRUST ACTS, CALIFORNIA
UNRUH ACT, CALIFORNIA UNFAIR
COMPETITION ACT AND CALIFORNIA FRAUD
STATUTE TRUMP-OUTWEIGH THE
DEFENDANTS'- IRVINE COMPANY LLC,THE, THE
IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, NEWPORT
BLUFFS, LLC, BORDEAUX APARTMENTS LLCS'
POLITICAL-FINANCIAL INFLUENCE IN
DODGING LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS OF
HOUSING DISCRIMINATION, CIVIL RIGHTS
DEPRIVATION, ANTITRUST FEDERAL AND
STATE PROTECTIONS AGAINST CATHOLICCHRISTIAN, MEXICAN HERITAGE, MALE,
FATHER OF FOUR-FAMILIAL STATUS,
MINORITY?

Should the U.S. Constitution and federal/state civil-rights, housing, antitrust laws trump the defendants' political-financial influence in dodging liability for housing-discrimination, civil-rights-deprivation, antitrust violations against protected classes?