No. 23-329
Chong Yim, et al. v. City of Seattle, Washington
Tags: civil-penalties criminal-history due-process fourteenth-amendment housing-ordinance landlord-tenant property-rights public-housing tenant-screening
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Takings FirstAmendment FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Takings FirstAmendment FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does Seattle's restriction on private owners' right to exclude potentially dangerous tenants from their property violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Seattle's restriction on private owners' right to exclude potentially dangerous tenants from their property violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause?
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-28
Reply of petitioners Chong Yim, et al. filed.
2023-12-15
Brief of respondent City of Seattle, Washington in opposition filed.
2023-11-13
Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.
2023-11-13
Brief amici curiae of Citizen Action Defense Fund, et al. filed.
2023-11-13
Brief amici curiae of National Apartment Association, et al. filed.
2023-11-13
Brief amici curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association, et al. filed.
2023-11-10
Brief amicus curiae of GRE Downtowner LLC filed.
2023-11-08
Brief amicus curiae of Manhattan Institute filed.
2023-10-19
Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.
2023-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 15, 2023.
2023-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2023 to December 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-12
Response Requested. (Due November 13, 2023)
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent City of Seattle, Washington to respond filed.
2023-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2023)
2023-06-28
Application (22A1127) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 27, 2023.
2023-06-23
Application (22A1127) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 28, 2023 to September 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Chong Yim, et al.
Brian Trevor Hodges — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
Citizen Action Defense Fund
City of Seattle, Washington
Roger D. Wynne — Seattle City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Consumer Data Industry Association and Professional Background Screening Association
Rebecca Everett Kuehn — Hudson Cook, LLP, Amicus
Goldwater Institute
Timothy Mason Sandefur — Goldwater Institute, Amicus
GRE Downtowner LLC
William Christopher Pooser — Stoel Rives LLP, Amicus
Manhattan Institute
Ilya Shapiro — Manhattan Institute, Amicus
National Apartment Association, Washington Multi-Family Housing Association, Apartment Owners Association of California, Inc.
Paul J. Beard II — FisherBroyles LLP, Amicus
The Buckeye Institute
David Christian Tryon — The Buckeye Institute, Amicus