No. 23-327
Tags: appellate-review clear-error fourth-amendment motion-to-suppress ornelas-standard ornelas-v-united-states probable-cause standard-of-review suppression-hearing
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the review of the evidence in a suppression-hearing record "in the light most favorable to the government" conflicts with Ornelas's standard of review and impermissibly places a thumb on the scales in favor of the prosecution in resolving Fourth Amendment claims.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the review of the evidence in a suppression-hearing record 'in the light most favorable to the government' conflicts with Ornelas's standard of review and impermissibly places a thumb on the scales in favor of the prosecution in resolving Fourth-Amendment
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-12
Reply of petitioner John Canada filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-10-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2023.
2023-10-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 30, 2023 to November 29, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2023)
Attorneys
John Canada
Jonathan Podolsky Schneller — O' Melveny & Myers, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent