No. 23-316

Curtiss Davis, III v. Pedro Bonilla, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: civil-liberties civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-protections due-process intelligence-identities-protection-act punitive-damages restitution sanctuary-policies standing summary-judgment
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether both the US District and US Court of Appeals had inequitably applied US laws to deny restitution; as well as, a default summary judgment and punitive damages in regards to the federal civil actions filed by the Petitioner (Mr. Davis).

and; that rulings to dismiss his civil action deviated from normal appellate practices by the Fourth Circuit Court to purposely deny an appeal as partisan support to "sanctuary policies" enforced by the local government of Fairfax County, VA.

and; that the enforcement of these "sanctuary policies" by Fairfax County violated the civil liberties of US citizens to assist illegal immigrants in defrauding US government programs in receiving benefits to reside legally in the United States.

and; that officers of the Fairfax County Police Department (FCPD) provided a false testimony to a magistrate to unconstitutionally attain a warrant to arrest an agent of the US government to assist undocumented immigrants evade apprehension and potential deportation by federal law enforcement.

and; Edwin C. Roessler Jr., sought the assistance from Journalists from the Washington Post and WUSA9 News to systematically disseminate, the protected identity, of a US agent to the public to intentionally compromise covert roles and investigative activities in support to US Intelligence Agencies, which violates the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (50 USC 421-426).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether both the US District and US Court of Appeals had inequitably applied US laws to deny restitution

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent WUSA-TV to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondents Edwin C. Roessier, Jr., Clinton E. Beach and Jeremy Hoffman to respond filed.
2023-05-31

Attorneys

Curtiss Davis
Curtiss Davis III — Petitioner
Edwin C. Roessier, Jr., Clinton E. Beach and Jeremy Hoffman
Brent J. SchultheisFairfax County Government, , Respondent
WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post
Nicholas Garber GamseWilliams & Connolly LLP, Respondent
WUSA-TV
Laurin Howard MillsWerther & Mills, LLC, Respondent