No. 23-310
Cory Ratzloff v. United States
Tags: administrative-law agency-deference agency-interpretation guidelines-commentary judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines stinson-v-united-states supreme-court-precedent united-states-sentencing-commission
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the administrative law principles
articulated in Kisor limit the deference owed to the
United States Sentencing Commission's commentary
on the Sentencing Guidelines.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor limit the deference owed to the United States Sentencing Commission's commentary on the Sentencing Guidelines
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-19
Reply of petitioner Cory Ratzloff filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-06
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-11-03
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2023-11-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2023.
2023-10-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2023 to December 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-06
Response Requested. (Due November 6, 2023)
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Cato Institute
Anastasia Paulinna Boden — Cato Institute, Amicus
Cory Ratzloff
Amanda Kelly Rice — Jones Day, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent