No. 23-309

Michael Paul Nelson v. North Carolina

Lower Court: North Carolina
Docketed: 2023-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights confrontation-clause criminal-procedure disability-rights due-process equal-access fundamental-rights reasonable-accommodation
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does the Confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment and/or the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment require a criminal court to modify its policies to allow a disabled defendant, who depends on prosthetic devices, to use such prosthetic devices during a criminal trial where the denial of same would effectively prevent the defendant from being present during all aspects of the criminal trial and where his absence frustrates the fairness of the trial?

2. Does at least the Fourteenth Amendment and/or federal anti-discrimination laws require a criminal trial court to provide a path for appellate review, before the trial, of the trial court's denial of a request for reasonable accommodations and modifications to court procedures, where such denial materially affects or denies a fundamental human right?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Confrontation Clause and/or Due Process Clause require a criminal court to modify policies to allow a disabled defendant to use prosthetic devices during trial?

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent North Carolina to respond filed.
2023-09-18

Attorneys

Michael P. Nelson
Michael Paul Nelson — Petitioner
North Carolina
Jonathan Porter BabbNorth Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent