No. 23-307
Kyran Javon Vaughn v. Louisiana
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: criminal-conviction criminal-defendants direct-review due-process griffith griffith-precedent non-unanimous-jury ramos ramos-decision retroactive-application retroactivity
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the rights afforded criminal defendants in Ramos apply retroactively to a case on direct review of the sentence only, given Griffith's holding that new rules for the conduct of criminal prosecutions be applied retroactively to all state "cases pending on direct review or not yet final."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rights afforded criminal defendants in Ramos apply retroactively to a case on direct review of the sentence only, given Griffith's holding
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-28
Reply of petitioner Kyran Vaughn filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-06
Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.
2023-10-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2023.
2023-10-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2023 to December 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-05
Response Requested. (Due November 6, 2023)
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Kyran Vaughn
Mark David Plaisance — Plaisance Law LLC, Petitioner
Louisiana
Matthew Caplan — District Attorney, 22nd Judicial District, Respondent
Shae Gary McPhee Jr. — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent