No. 23-306
The TriZetto Group, Inc., et al. v. Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited, et al.
Tags: actual-loss avoided-costs circuit-split damages defend-trade-secrets-act federal-statute misappropriation trade-secrets unjust-enrichment
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a plaintiff may seek avoided costs as a measure of unjust-enrichment damages if and only if the plaintiff has suffered a "compensable harm beyond its lost profits"—a novel limitation imposed by the Second Circuit that finds no support in the plain language of the DTSA or the common law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plaintiff may seek avoided costs as a measure of unjust-enrichment damages if and only if the plaintiff has suffered a 'compensable harm beyond its lost profits'
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-18
Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed. (Distributed)
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited, et al. to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2023)
2023-08-15
Application (23A122) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 22, 2023.
2023-08-09
Application (23A122) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 23, 2023 to September 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
American Intellectual Property Law Association
Troy Edwin Grabow — Law Office of Troy Grabow, Amicus
Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited, et al.
The TriZetto Group, Inc., et al.
John Caviness O'Quinn — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner