No. 23-298

Riverdale Mills Corporation v. Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2023-09-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law auer-deference due-process federal-rules-of-evidence occupational-safety-and-health-administration osha-citation substantial-evidence
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals correctly applied the substantial evidence standard as articulated by this Court's prior precedent.

2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals correctly applied Auer deference pursuant to the analysis set out by this Court in Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019).

3. Whether the admission of a prior out-of-court statement of a non-managerial employee, which constituted the sole evidence in support of an Occupational Safety and Health Administration citation in an administrative adjudication, is a violation of an employer's due process rights or was reversible error under Federal Rule of Evidence 403.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals correctly applied the substantial-evidence-standard

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent Secretary of Labor to respond filed.
2023-09-21

Attorneys

Riverdale Mills Corporation
Travis Wayne VanceFisher & Phillips LLP, Petitioner
Secretary of Labor
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent